Maria Skaalum Petersen vart ph.d.ritgerð
Fríggjadagin 6. mars vardi Maria Skaalum Petersen ph.d. ritgerð sína: " Gene-environment interaction: PCB and mercury exposure, P450 enzymes and Parkingson's disease in the Faroe Islands " á Syddansk Universitet.
Metingarnevndin segði í síni niðurstøðu, at ritgerðin er merkisverd og omanfyri miðal donsku ph.d.ritgerðirnar í dag. Serliga ein av greinunum verður tikin fram sum nýbrot innan sítt øki.
Í metingarnevndini vóru:
Dr. med. Lars Barregård, professari á Avd. för samhällsmedicin och folkhälsa, Arbets- och miljömedicin, Göteborgs Universitet,
Ph.d. Herman Autrup, professari á Afdeling for Miljø- og Arbejdsmedicin, Aarhus Universitet
Cand.med. Bernard Jeune, lektari á Epidemiologi, Institut for Sundhedstjenesteforskning, Syddansk Universitet (formaður)
Les niðurstøðuna hjá metingarnevndini niðanfyri.
Dr.med. Philippe Grandjean, professari á Miljømedicin, Institut for Sundhedstjenesteforskning, Syddansk Universitet hevur verið høvuðsvegleiðari.
Pál Weihe, yvirlækni, Deildin fyri Arbeiðs- og Almannaheilsu, og dr. med. Kim Brøsen, professari á Afdelingen for Klinisk Farmakologi, SDU, hava verið hjávegleiðarar
Les meira um Mariu Skaalum Petersen í Heilagrunninum
Niðurstøðan hjá metingarnevndini:
MSP's thesis is an impressive piece of work. The five papers have a scientific standard above the average for a Danish PhD thesis which nowadays should be finished in just three years. The papers are published in respected scientific journals with relatively high ranks. The studies concern an important scientific area, and several of the studies are original in the sense that no similar studies have been performed. Especially Paper 111 has a high degree of originality. Although several findings are negative, maybe due to too small samples or lack of adjustment for some possible confounders, there are also several confirmations of previous findings, and a few new findings. The conclusions in the individual papers and the thesis review are presented with caution. The points of critique that can be put forward could be further discussed at the defence of the thesis. This thesis clearly demonstrates the author's capacity to carry out a scientific project involving independent use of the scientific methodology of the subject.
We conclude that this thesis clearly fulfils the requirements mentioned in the Guidelines, and that it, therefore, can be defended orally.
Lars Barregård Herman Autrup Bernard Jeune